>Maybe I'm wrong but the first thing I thought of reading
>your description was these could be used to add comments on
>a random basis to product review pages. With the pinging of
>the rss feed created as it updates, and it being submitted
>to rss directories, this could add life to a static html
>review site a la IPK.

Hi Sandra,

I don't know what IPK is???

But yes, it can add "life" to any static html pages, and PHP pages for that matter.

Commentz/Hubz doesn't add random comments, but does allow others to add comments, as well as easily moderate those comments.

Lets say you have 10 different review sites, all on different domains. Commentz/Hubz will check each of those domains and let you pick/choose/modify comments for all those domains from one Tuelz admin page.

Commentz/Hubz will also allow your User to add new pages of their own, which are moderated in the same way.

Another thing Commentz/Hubz does is "process" a folder full of pages. For example, let's say you spun 500 pages using my Tuelz method. Commentz/Hubz will add comment forms to each of these pages, allowing readers to post comments. This will help "dedoop" the pages.

The difference is, Hubz can process the pages and "drip feed" them. Commentz can't and will upload them all at once.

Both also make it easy for you to just type/copy-paste content into it to create a new page. For example, copy an article from EA and just paste it into Commentz and Commentz will take care of the linking, uploading, adding the template, pinging, etc.

The one drawback is you need to add your own html for links, headings, bulleted lists, etc. On the other hand, you have complete control over the html you add. You're not limited like you would be with a blog.

I posted a WSO with the very basics of Commentz and a "quick start guide" that includes 12 ready-to-go templates. Bombers can download this WSO here:
http://dombom.com/WSO/Commentz/Commentz-get-page-wso.html